h1

Jackson Browne’s “Rebel Jesus”

November 10, 2009

This week’s Music Monday song is an oldie, but a goodie…

For those who know me, or this blog, you can assume the song should not be judged at face value… At least not until you’ve gotten past the first verse or so…

The streets are filled with laughter and light
And the music of the season
And the merchants’ windows are all bright
With the faces of the children
And the families hurrying to their homes
As the sky darkens and freezes
Will be gathering around the hearths and tables
Giving thanks for all God’s graces
And the birth of the rebel Jesus

They call him by the “Prince of Peace”
And they call him by “The Saviour”
And they pray to him upon the sea
And in every bold endeavor
As they fill his churches with their pride and gold
And their faith in him increases
But they’ve turned the nature that I worshipped in
From a temple to a robber’s den
In the words of the rebel Jesus

We guard our world with locks and guns
And we guard our fine possessions
And once a year when Christmas comes
We give to our relations
And perhaps we give a little to the poor
If the generosity should seize us
But if any one of us should interfere
In the business of why there are poor
They get the same as the rebel Jesus

But pardon me if I have seemed
To take the tone of judgement
For I’ve no wish to come between
This day and your enjoyment
In this life of hardship and of earthly toil
We have need for anything that frees us
So I bid you pleasure and I bid you cheer
From a heathen and a pagan
On the side of the rebel Jesus.

The streets are filled with laughter and light

And the music of the season

And the merchants’ windows are all bright

With the faces of the children

And the families hurrying to their homes

As the sky darkens and freezes

Will be gathering around the hearths and tables

Giving thanks for all God’s graces

And the birth of the rebel Jesus

They call him by the “Prince of Peace”

And they call him by “The Saviour”

And they pray to him upon the sea

And in every bold endeavor

As they fill his churches with their pride and gold

And their faith in him increases

But they’ve turned the nature that I worshipped in

From a temple to a robber’s den

In the words of the rebel Jesus

We guard our world with locks and guns

And we guard our fine possessions

And once a year when Christmas comes

We give to our relations

And perhaps we give a little to the poor

If the generosity should seize us

But if any one of us should interfere

In the business of why there are poor

They get the same as the rebel Jesus

But pardon me if I have seemed

To take the tone of judgement

For I’ve no wish to come between

This day and your enjoyment

In this life of hardship and of earthly toil

We have need for anything that frees us

So I bid you pleasure and I bid you cheer

From a heathen and a pagan

On the side of the rebel Jesus.

h1

Damn, missed again…

November 9, 2009

One day a priest and a nun went golfing.
The first hole the priest missed an extremely easy put. He shouted, “Damn, missed again.”
The nun, shocked, warned him “God will get you for that.”
The next hole the same thing occurred. After the priest screamed “Damn It! Missed again” the nun repeated her warning “God will get you for that!”
On the third hole, the priest again missed, and cursed, but before the nun could repeat her warning, A bolt of lightning came down from the heavens and struck the nun dead.
A deep voice from the clouds boomed out “Damn It! Missed again!”.

Yes, this joke is as old as dirt…

Yes, this joke is pretty lame…

Yes, this joke really isn’t even funny…

But Saturday afternoon, this joke actually became somewhat important in a so-called “divide” within the atheist community.

In late September Paul Kurtz, the founder of the Center For Inquiry, wrote “A Dissenting View About Blasphemy Day” in which he criticized the idea of “CFI itself to sponsor the lampooning of Christianity by encouraging anti-Catholic, anti-Protestant, or any other anti-religious cartoons“.

Well Paul, isn’t this joke lampooning catholics (or at least catholic nuns)?

Isn’t this joke lampooning their god as inept?

You characterize this painting as a “cartoon”, when it makes a serious point about an actual belief on the catholic church (and a belief that was shown during the Cracker Gate episode that some segment of catholics are willing to use violence to support), and yet your own joke is acceptable?

divinewine

Paul, with all due respect, because I do respect all you have done for the skeptical and atheist/humanist communities, you are wrong in criticizing blasphemy, and hypocritical in telling that joke.

h1

Quote of the Moment

November 8, 2009

I’ve run across this quote many times in many places, but I don’t believe I had shared it here before…

While it’s short and pithy, it certainly makes a good point, and one that most christians (hell, most believers) have just never thought of before…

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
” – Epicurus

h1

Jon Stewart uncovers the ORGANized conspiracy against Glenn Beck

November 6, 2009

Inspired by Glenn Beck recently having his appendix removed, Jon Stewart took the opportunity to parody the man, the myth, the legend, the Beck…

The Huffington Post did a good writeup on the episode:

“Apparently the medicine that was good enough for our founding fathers is now considered politically or medically incorrect,” Stewart said employing both air quotes and crazy voice registers that left the viewer wondering who and what he was quoting. “I’m not saying this is a plot by Hitler to steal Glenn Beck from all of us internal organ by internal organ by internal organ and then reprogram him to use as a weapon. But isn’t it fascinating that I’m the only one with the courage to ask these questions?” He proceeded to jump up from his seat and run over to a chalk board that had the human anatomy scrawled on it alongside Che, acorns and the Russian flag. It only got better from there.

more about “Jon Stewart Does Glenn Beck: Devotes …“, posted with vodpod
h1

Quote Of The Moment

November 5, 2009

Among those whom I like or admire, I can find no common denominator; but among those who I love I can, all of them make me laugh.” – W. H. Auden

h1

A more positive public image for atheists/skeptics…

November 4, 2009

You hear this often in media when an atheist or skeptic is going up against a believer…

Richard Dawkins is an unapologetic atheist.

Sam Harris is a outspoken non-believer.

James Randi is a strident skeptic.

Most recently I came across this on some christian radio program from Britain where PZ Myers was being interviewed. The moderator introduced the theist he was up against perfectly normally while PZ was introduced as an “outspoken atheist”.

But this is not about one example, or even a handful of examples. This is about what at least in my view seems to be the “norm” in the media today. Whenever the person being referred to is an atheist, skeptic, or non-believer, they are referred to with some adjective associated that typically has a negative connotation or an implication of some negative trait.

I think the answer to why is pretty straight forward. We are still one of the few minorities that it is acceptable to denigrate in public today. So we are left with the more important questions which are raised by this trend.

When will atheism/skepticism not need these qualifiers in the media?
What can we do to create a more positive image of the atheist/skeptical community in the public mind?
How do we go about making atheism/skepticism acceptable, normal, and in some sense, just ”no big deal”?

h1

(Fill In Celebrity Name) Believes in …, Therefore I Should As Well

November 3, 2009

I’d like to start off with an admission of guilt. I’m just as guilty of this as others. I have used this concept myself (referring to Celebrity Atheists for example) in the past, and I’m sure I’ll do it again in the future.

It’s such an easy fallacy to fall into. Somebody famous says something, believes something, or supports something, and of course it must be the correct belief.
Oprah recommends a book, millions buy it.
Bono support some cause, millions donate to it.
Sean Penn supports a political candidate, millions support them.
George Foreman sells some cheap indoor grill, millions buy them.

I would like to add one small caveat. This does not apply when the celebrity in question is speaking on an area where they have proven expertise.
If Robert DeNiro says somebody is a damn good actor, odds are that person is a damn good actor…
If Neil deGrasse Tyson says Pluto has more in common with the icey bodies in the outer solar system than it does with the planets, then it’s a safe bet that Pluto should be counted along side the icey bodies and not Earth, Jupiter, etc…
If Whitney Houston says somebody has a great singing voice, that person almost certainly has a great singing voice…
If Snoop says a bag contains some chronic weed, it’s almost certain that whoever smokes it is getting high as hell…

So what makes us flock to and listen to those who have no more insight and no better judgement than ourselves?

Why is it that people will dismiss the medical community, but listen to somebody like Jenny McCarthy about the health, and potentially the life, of their children?
Why would people listen to Kirk Cameron, but reject over 99.5% of accredited scientists?
When Joe Rogan questions the moon landings, why does some group of people listen to him over Neil fucking Armstrong who was there?

What makes some people respect the opinion of celebrities on subjects they know nothing about; and at the same time reject that consensus of opinion from experts on that subject?

And what will it take to stop us from doing this?

h1

A brief look at Rodibidably…

November 2, 2009

A brief look at Rodibidably for October 2009 (which once again was the highest number of hits for a month in the history of this blog):

Top Posts
Homosexual Necrophilia In The Mallard Duck (once again, this post often makes me wonder what kind of freaks are out there in the world)
13 random scientific questions I want answered
Cleaning up TempDB (the fact that almost every month, this is my top read post makes me think that perhaps I need to focus more of technical posts)
Holy shit (pun intended), the right wing want to rewrite the bible
Tim Minchin’s “If You Open Your Mind Too Much Your Brains Will Fall Out”
Theory (Scientific vs layman’s definition)
The History Of Everything Timeline
Accepting an invitation from a christian to have a dialog
Carl Sagan – ‘A Glorious Dawn’ ft Stephen Hawkin
Tyranny of the Majority

Top Referrers
blogsurfer.us
nanowrimo.org
alphainventions.com
stumbleupon.com
networkedblogs.com
facebook.com
craigslist.com
brokenspectrum.com
en.search.wordpress.com
uncertainhope.wordpress.com

Top Search Terms
scientific questions
tim minchin quotes
homosexual necrophilia in the mallard duck
tyranny of the majority
keith richards
crack whore
ardi lucy
what drugs do to you
images of cartoon people doing drugs
most dangerous animal on earth

h1

NeeKo ft. Deana Marie’s “ILL STATE OF MIND”

November 1, 2009

I would normally not promote Philly, but this song kinda rocks…

yeah im talkin b hop
more like a balboa
never been to my city
come on wit me ill show ya
home of the fresh prince
jazzier than jeff is
back in the day doc j rock a 76
jersey just across the bridge
betsy ross walt whit
benjamin franklin
1776
state our independence
high as kites ever since
sayin you from philly
you reap nothin but the benefits
plus its always sunny here
just in case ya unaware
citizens be bankin in
can we get another year
yeah im talkin repeat
heat like hamels
utley amazin
charlie wrote the manuel
broad street bullies
nothins flyer than a flyers fan
missin all his teeth
bobby clarke still smilin
rocky on the first step
headin to that top one
yeah thats me
we go hard where
im from

chorus
In philly
concrete jungle where dreams are made of
theres nothin you cant do
now youre in philly
these streets will make you feel brand new
these lights will inspire you
lets hear it for philly x3

back when we had sly bacon
whoops i mean cunningham
right after jaws
and right before the running man
so much wit
prolly get it from the cheesesteaks
i been out all night i just wanna sleep late
young crowd olde city
tell me where the party at
meet the girl on south street
better rock ya party cap
cruisin down city ave
headin to the boulevard
coulda grabbed the El
but they told me that it wouldnt spark
this where im comin from
who knows where we goin to
i feel like im in line for a ride
when im at tony lukes
we could lose all the trees
but we still got the roots
plus we got beans
and an eve that doesnt opt for fruit
green blood in the tube
if we need it transfused
when the mets come thru
youre gonna hear our fans boo
this is the city of the brotherly love
and if youve never been here
i suggest that you come to

chorus

now that we got vick
i think we need the vet back
tougher than a stitch
on a mitchell and ness cap
liberty bell crack
walnut chestnut
aint justa ill track
more like the best of
215
yeah i covered all of that
from way back to the future
with this almanac
illadelph artifax
love park heart attacks
always on the grind till i die
spillin all the facts
yeah the way im writin
youd think that im a titan
the way my penns landin
the crowd is left standin
d e mandin
chantin
one more encore
whos the new kid i never heard em before
so reggie white wit a mic
bringin hits all night
cant afford this flow
a praise for no price
they call me neeko
this is for my people
ill state of mind
everywhere we go

h1

You, yes you reading this right now, are bisexual…

October 30, 2009

This title is not directed at a single person, it is actually directed at every human living today, every human who has ever lived, and every human who will ever live…

This is an idea I have had in my mind for years, and I’ve never really thought it fully through before, so in part this post is to allow me to think through it more fully than I have before.

Almost every animal you can think of (including humans) are sexual animals. This has many purposes from an evolutionary perspective including reproduction, dominance, pleasure, and more. A 1999 review by researcher Bruce Bagemihl shows that homosexual behavior, has been observed in close to 1500 species, ranging from primates to gut worms, and is well documented for 500 of them.[2][3]  This should help to show that sexuality is not only about reproduction, and that homosexuality is not is not only about defying god or whatever random bullshit some stone age mythology would have you believe.

Essentially my idea is that sexuality is much more of a sliding scale than a set of hard and fast points. There is no “straight”, there is no “gay”, there is only sexuality. If you think of the straightest person you know or the gayest person you know (or feel free to use yourself for one of the two examples if you think it fits) you may say to yourself that they are 100% straight or 100% gay, but I’d argue that they are not straight or gay, but various positions along a sliding scale.

Now I realize that this is a simple enough concept that obviously I would not be the first to think of it, although when I’ve mentioned it to friends in the past they found it interesting but had not thought of it that way themselves.

In fact to prove to myself that this idea is not unique to me, I found a number of quotes on this same idea, many of whoich obviously pre-date me based on the fact that they were made by people who died before I was born.

“All human beings are bisexual – & their libido is distributed between objects of both sexes, either in a manifest or a latent form.” – Freud

“Humans do not fall exclusively into heterosexual or homosexual classifications but somewhere in between.” – Kinsey

“Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. Not all things are black nor all things white. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories. Only the human mind invents categories and tries to force facts into separated pigeon-holes. The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects. The sooner we learn this concerning human sexual behavior, the sooner we shall reach a sound understanding of the realities of sex.” – Kinsey

“Sex is a continuum. You go through different phases along life’s way … and if you don’t, you’ve been sort of cheated… the reason no one has yet been able to come up with a good word to describe the homosexualist (sometimes known as gay, fag, queer, etc.) is because he does not exist. The human race is divided into male and female. Many human beings enjoy the sexual relations with their own sex, many don’t; many respond to both. The plurality is the fact of our nature and not worth fretting about.” – Gore Vidal

“The time has come, I think, when we must recognize bisexuality as a normal form of human behavior. . . we shall not really succeed in discarding the straitjacket of our cultural beliefs about sexual choice if we fail to come to terms with the well-documented, normal human capacity to love members of both sexes.” – Margaret Mead

“To deny it implies that it’s wrong.” – Alan Cumming

“Homosexuality was invented by a straight world dealing with its own bisexuality.” – Kate Millett, Flying

“A homosexual or bisexual individual may experience conflict with a homophobic society; however, such conflict is not a symptom of dysfunction in the individual. The APA Board recognized that a significant portion of homosexual and bisexual people were clearly satisfied with their sexual orientation and showed no signs of psychopathology.” – Fact Sheet, Homosexual and Bisexual Issues, American Psychiatric Association.

“All great novels, all true novels, are bisexual.” – Milan Kundera

“Virginia Woolf said that writers must be androgynous. I’ll go a step further. You must be bisexual.” – Rita Mae Brown

“The dilemma of traditional sex research lay in the unconscious, but unquestioningly assumed division into opposing drives and hereditary factors. . . The division into heterosexuality and homosexuality, into heterosexuals and homosexuals, is also an artifact that rests on a grave error, namely, on the assumption that a fundamentally different model is necessary to explain heterosexual and homosexual behavior. The entire investigation of etiology was ideologically loaded beforehand because it separated a segment of the sexual continuum and attempted to make analyses with the help of fundamentally different concepts.” – Rolf Gindorf

“So you see, there are some very clear examples in the animal kingdom about why “gay” animals came into existence – and why we are still around and why the “gay gene” doesn’t die out. It clearly serves a purpose for the overall benefit of its specific animal group. Perhaps in some animal groups, the purpose is to control over-population, but in other groups, that doesn’t seem to be the case.” – David S.

So clearly this idea is not unique to me. But it is one that few people seem familiar with. And while to me it seems obvious that it is true, to many people it is a dangerous, even heretical idea.

You may not like it (that does not make it less true). You may think I’m trying to offend you (I’m not). You may think your “holy book” contradicts you (I could care not possibly less about your book). But it’s clear.

You are bisexual.